From the President
(Call for papers)
May 2011
Dear Colleagues and Members of the ACPA:
I am delighted to have the pleasure of inviting you to the Eighty-sixth Annual Meeting
of the ACPA in Los Angeles, California, to take place in the Fall of 2012 (late
October or early November). This meeting is generously hosted by Loyola Marymount
University.
Our theme will be Philosophy in the Abrahamic Traditions.
Classical and Post-Classical Philosophy in the Greek tradition played powerful roles
in the formation of philosophical, scientific and theological thought produced in
the religious and cultural milieux of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The scriptures,
theologies and fundamental concerns of these Abrahamic religious traditions have
reciprocally enriched the development of both religious thought and secular philosophy
and science, by prompting ethical, metaphysical and epistemological questions that
have continued to challenge philosophers from the time of Philo up to the present
day. While political conflicts of the 20th and 21st centuries have led to a public
emphasis on distinctions and differences among these faiths, the history of philosophy
shows over the centuries that thinkers of each tradition share in the common purpose
of seeking to reconcile the principles and insights of their beliefs with the truths
of secular natural reason. Through argument and counter argument philosophers and
theologians have engaged their peers and predecessors inside and outside their own
faith traditions, in order to advance to more and more sophisticated and penetrating
analyses of faith principles, philosophy, and truth. For our 2012 meeting I propose
that we take the occasion to enter into the same sorts of engagements within and
across specific historical and religious boundaries, without topical restriction,
so that we may come to better understand the richness of our own tradition and the
commonalities of thinkers of the religions of the Abrahamic traditions.
Everyone is cordially invited to make a submission for this meeting. While the Program
Committee is particularly interested in submissions addressing issues of the theme,
papers in any area of philosophy are most welcome.
Please see the attached guidelines for information on how to submit.
Yours sincerely,
Richard C. Taylor
Professor of Philosophy
Marquette University,
Visiting Research Professor 2010-11
DeWulf-Mansion Centre for Ancient, Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy,
Hoger Instituut voor Wijsbegeerte, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
ACPA National Office
Center for Thomistic Studies, University of St. Thomas
3800 Montrose Blvd., Houston, TX 77006
Phone: (713) 525-3596 Fax: (713) 942-3483
E-mail: houser@stthom.edu, acpa@stthom.edu
Web: www.acpaweb.org
ACPA Subscription and Membership Services
Philosophy Documentation Center
P.O. Box 7147, Charlottesville, VA 22906-7147
Phone: (800) 444-2419
E-mail: order@pdcnet.org
Web: www.pdcnet.org
Revised Guidelines for Submitting Papers
for the ACPA Annual Meeting, 2—4 November 2012
Los Angeles, CA (hosted by Loyola Marymount University)
Marina Del Rey Marriott
4100 Admiralty Way
Marina Del Rey, CA 90292
(Deadline for Submissions: April 12, 2012)
Please note that our procedure for submitting papers has changed. We now ask you
to submit papers electronically, as email attachments.
1) The theme of the 2012 meeting is
Philosophy in the Abrahamic Traditions; however,
papers on all topics are welcome.
2) Papers should be received no later than 12 April 2012, at one of the following
email addresses:
acpa@stthom.edu or
houser@stthom.edu
3) Submissions
must be received through email. Please save your paper in Microsoft
Word or pdf. (Other formats are not acceptable.) Send your paper as an email attachment
to us at
acpa@stthom.edu or
houser@stthom.edu. Your paper should not exceed 15 typed, double-spaced
pages, 12 pitch (30 minutes reading time). The paper
must begin with a short abstract
(150 words), suitable for inclusion in the conference program. (The abstract will
not be counted against the overall length of your paper.)
4) The format of the paper should be appropriate for
blind reviewing, that is,
nothing
in the paper itself should reveal the author’s identity. (We will take care that
your paper is not identifiable in the way it is saved by us, as blind review is
one of the strengths of our conference papers and our proceedings.)
5)
In the body of your email, please include:
Author’s name,
University affiliation,
Complete postal address,
Home phone number,
Work phone number,
Fax number,
E-mail address that will be good from 2 April 2012 through 1 September 2012.
(If you use more than one email address, please include all of them.)
6) It is understood that, by submitting material for possible presentation at the
2012 Annual Meeting, authors agree to allow the ACPA to hold the copyright to such
material, should it be accepted for presentation at the Annual Meeting and publication
in the Annual Proceedings. If the paper is accepted, you will be asked to sign a
publication agreement with us.
7) Those authors who wish to have their papers considered for the ACPA Young Scholar’s
Award (scholars 35 years of age or younger, regardless of academic position, are
eligible)
should indicate as much in the body their email.
8) We will acknowledge receipt of your paper by email, shortly after it is submitted.
Then
between 1 and 15 July 2012, we will inform you if your paper has been accepted
for the conference, and for publication in the
ACPA Proceedings.
9) If you would like to comment on a paper or to chair a session, please let the
ACPA Secretary know by sending a separate e-mail to
acpa@stthom.edu or
houser@stthom.edu
or by writing to the ACPA’s National Office. Be sure to provide your e-mail address,
as well as your fax, home, and work telephone numbers, and your area of philosophical
expertise.
Secretary's Letter: May 2010
May 2010
Enclosed you will find a dues notice for the upcoming year, along with the President-Elect's
"Letter and Call for Papers" for the 2011 Annual Meeting (to be held in St. Louis,
Missouri, and hosted by Saint Louis University). Please pay your dues on time, since
the timely payment of your dues will eliminate the need for reminder notices and
thereby help to reduce the ACPA's overall costs.
Herewith I am also sending you a memo containing a number of announcements and reminders.
Be Sure to Update Your Membership Information on the Dues Renewal Notice
There are two ways to pay your dues: online by clicking on the link on the Dues
Renewal Notice (above), or by sending in the notice to the Philosophy Documentation
Center. All members are asked to update any membership information (including mailing
address, institutional affiliation, e-mail address, etc.) that may have changed
over the past year or two. Since we are moving over to sending notices by email,
it is imperative that we have your current email address(es). Life members are also
asked to update their membership information in the same manner, even though they
do not pay dues.
2009 Proceedings
The Proceedings from the ACPA's 2009 annual meeting (hosted by Loyola of New Orleans)
are being edited and will be mailed out to members early in the fall.
ACPA Meeting hosted by Loyola University of Maryland, Baltimore,
5 - 7 November 2010: "Philosophy and Language"
Don't forget that the 2010 Annual Meeting of the ACPA will take place 5 - 7 November,
in Baltimore, Maryland, at the Doubletree Inn at the Colonnade. As usual, the complete
conference program, along with registration materials for the 2010 Annual Meeting,
will be sent out to members in September of 2010. Earlier than that, you will be
able to register for the conference and to inspect the conference program online,
at the ACPA website. In order to whet your philosophical appetites, let me mention
here that the plenary speakers for the 2010 Annual Meeting are:
Therese-Anne Druart (The Catholic University of America):
Ann Hartle (Emory University):
Stephen Brown (Boston College):
Daniel Dahlstrom (Boston University):
At the 2010 Meeting, the Association's Aquinas Medal will be presented to Alasdair
MacIntyre.
Commentators and Chairs at the Baltimore meeting
If you would like to be on the program of the 2010 Annual Meeting (either as a commentator
or as a chair), please send your name and contact information (including phone number,
FAX number, e-mail address, and regular mailing address) to me. Be sure to do so
by 15 June 2010. If you are interested in serving as a commentator, be sure to indicate
your area(s) of interest and/or expertise.
Satellite Sessions at the Baltimore meeting
There were twenty satellite sessions at New Orleans in 2009. We hope there will
be even more this year. Satellite session organizers are reminded that final information
regarding planned satellite sessions (session title, names of organizer, session
chair, and speakers, and the titles of papers) should be received at the National
Office no later than 1 July 2010.
Election Results
The complete results of this year's ACPA election (concluded April 1, 2010) are
as follows:
Vice-President/President-Elect: Richard C. Taylor (Marquette University)
Executive Council Members:
Carlson, John W. (Jack) (Creighton University)
Foster, David (Seton Hall)
Garcia, J. L. A. (Boston College)
Kent, Bonnie (University of California, Irvine)
Murray, Elizabeth A. (Loyola Marymount University)
On behalf of the Association, the Secretary would like to congratulate our newly-elected
Council members, and to thank all who were willing to stand for election. The new
members will take office at the conclusion of the 2010 meeting and will be on the
Executive Council through the 2013 meeting.
2011 ACPA Meeting in St. Louis, Missouri (hosted by St. Louis University): "Science,
Reason, and Religion"
The Executive Committee of the ACPA has determined that the theme of the 2011 conference
(to be held in the fall of 2011 and to be hosted by St. Louis University will be
"Science, Reason, and Religion." For further details about the meeting, please see
the enclosed letter from President-Elect Dominic Balestra.
Hosts for 2012 and 2013
We are looking for volunteers to host the 2012 meeting, and are still open to applications
for hosting the 2013 meeting. If you are interested, please contact the National
Secretary at houser@stthom.edu.
Call for Nominations for the Office of ACPA Secretary: Nominations due 1 October
2010.
The current term of the Secretary of the ACPA will end after the Annual Meeting
in 2010. The next term will commence at the end of the Annual Meeting in 2010 and
finish at the end of the Annual Meeting in 2013. Nominations for the office of Secretary
(2010-2013 term) are hereby solicited. Nominating materials should include a full
curriculum vitae of the nominee, along with a statement of the nominee's relevant
qualifications. These nominating materials should be received at the National Office
no later than 1 October 2010.
Respectfully submitted,
R. E. Houser, Interim ACPA Secretary
Secretary's Letter: May 2011
Enclosed you will find a dues notice for the upcoming year, the President-Elect's
"Letter and Call for Papers" for the 2012 Annual Meeting (to be held in Los Angeles,
California, and hosted by Loyola Marymount University), and "Guidelines for Submitting
Papers" for 2012. Please pay your dues on time, since the timely payment of your
dues will eliminate the need for reminder notices and thereby help to reduce the
ACPA's overall costs. Herewith I am also sending you a memo containing a number
of announcements and reminders.
For the 2011 Meeting:
1. Be Sure to Update Your Membership Information on the Dues Renewal Notice
There are two ways to pay your dues: online by clicking on the link on the Dues
Renewal Notice, or by sending in the notice to the Philosophy Documentation Center.
All members are asked to update any membership information (including mailing address,
institutional affiliation, e-mail address, etc.) that may have changed over the
past year or two. Since we now send this notice by email, it is imperative that
we have your current email address(es). Life members are also asked to update their
membership information in the same manner, even though they do not pay dues.
2. 2010 Proceedings
The Proceedings from the ACPA's 2010 annual meeting (hosted by Loyola of Maryland)
have been edited, sent off to the publisher, and they should be mailed out to members
early in the fall.
3. ACPA Meeting hosted by St. Louis University, St. Louis, 28 - 30 October 2011:
"Science, Reason, and Religion"
Don't forget that the 2011 Annual Meeting of the ACPA will take place 28 - 30 October
2011, in St. Louis, Missouri, at the Chase Park Plaza Hotel, St. Louis, which is
not far from St. Louis University. As usual, the complete conference program, along
with registration materials for the 2011 Annual Meeting, will be sent out to members
in September of 2011. By June you will be able to register for the conference at
the ACPA website, and by September you will be able to inspect the conference program
online. In order to whet your philosophical appetites, let me mention here that
the plenary speakers for the 2010 Annual Meeting are:
John Cottingham, Professor Emeritus, University of Reading, Professorial Research
Fellow, Heythrop College, University of London. "Confronting the Cosmos: Scientific
Rationality and Human Understanding."
Michael Ruse, Florida State University, "Making Room for Faith: Does Science Have
Limits?"
John F. Haught, Georgetown University "Darwin, Faith and Critical Intelligence."
Dominic J. Balestra, Fordham University, "Galileo's Legacy: Getting the Relationship
In-Between Scientism and Literalism Right"
At the 2011 Meeting, the Association's Aquinas Medal will be presented to J.L.A.
Gracia.
4. Commentators and Chairs at the St. Louis meeting
If you would like to be on the program of the 2011 Annual Meeting (either as a commentator
or as a chair), please send your name and contact information (including phone number,
FAX number, e-mail address, and regular mailing address) to me (email addresses
below). Be sure to do so by 15 June 2011. If you are interested in serving as a
commentator, be sure to indicate your area(s) of interest or expertise.
5. Satellite Sessions at the St. Louis meeting
There were twenty satellite sessions at New Orleans in 2009 and nineteen in Baltimore,
the maximum capacity of the hotel each year. Judging from the large number of submissions
for the "contributed papers," we hope there will be even more this year. Satellite
session organizers are reminded that final information regarding planned satellite
sessions (session title, names of organizer, session chair, and speakers, and the
titles of papers) should be received at the National Office no later than 1 July
2011.
For the 2012 Meeting:
1. Election Results:
The complete results of this year's ACPA election (concluded April 2, 2011) are
as follows:
Vice-President/President-Elect: John O'Callaghan (Notre Dame University)
Executive Council Members:
Arthur Madigan, SJ (Boston College)
Janet Smith (Sacred Heart Major Seminary)
Mary C. Sommers (University of St. Thomas, Houston)
Alice Ramos (St. John's University)
Joshua Hochschild (Mt. St. Mary's University)
On behalf of the Association, the Secretary would like to congratulate our newly-elected
Council members, and to thank all who were willing to stand for election. The new
members will take office at the conclusion of the 2011 meeting and will be on the
Executive Council through the 2014 meeting:
2. 2012 ACPA Meeting in Los Angeles, California (hosted by Loyola Marymount)
The Executive Committee of the ACPA has determined that the theme of the 2012 conference
(to be held in the fall of 2012 and to be hosted by Loyola Marymount University)
will be Philosophy in the Abrahamic Traditions. For further details about the meeting,
please see the enclosed letter from President-Elect Richard C. Taylor.
For the 2013 Meeting
1. Hosts for 2013 and 2014
We are looking for volunteers to host the 2013 and 2014 meetings. If you are interested,
please contact the National Secretary.
Respectfully submitted,
R. E. Houser, ACPA National Secretary
houser@stthom.edu acpa@stthom.edu
ACPA National Office
Center for Thomistic Studies, University of St. Thomas
3800 Montrose Blvd., Houston, TX 77006
Phone: (713) 525-3596 Fax: (713) 942-3483
E-mail: houser@stthom.edu, acpa@stthom.edu
Web: www.acpaweb.org
ACPA Subscription and Membership Services
Philosophy Documentation Center
P.O. Box 7147, Charlottesville, VA 22906-7147
Phone: (800) 444-2419
E-mail: order@pdcnet.org
Web: www.pdcnet.org
Vice President's Letter: May 2011
May 2011
Dear Colleagues and Members of the ACPA:
I am delighted to have the pleasure of inviting you to the Eighty-sixth Annual Meeting
of the ACPA in Los Angeles, California, to take place in the Fall of 2012 (late
October or early November). This meeting is generously hosted by Loyola Marymount
University.
Our theme will be Philosophy in the Abrahamic Traditions.
Classical and Post-Classical Philosophy in the Greek tradition played powerful roles
in the formation of philosophical, scientific and theological thought produced in
the religious and cultural milieux of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. The scriptures,
theologies and fundamental concerns of these Abrahamic religious traditions have
reciprocally enriched the development of both religious thought and secular philosophy
and science, by prompting ethical, metaphysical and epistemological questions that
have continued to challenge philosophers from the time of Philo up to the present
day. While political conflicts of the 20th and 21st centuries have led to a public
emphasis on distinctions and differences among these faiths, the history of philosophy
shows over the centuries that thinkers of each tradition share in the common purpose
of seeking to reconcile the principles and insights of their beliefs with the truths
of secular natural reason. Through argument and counter argument philosophers and
theologians have engaged their peers and predecessors inside and outside their own
faith traditions, in order to advance to more and more sophisticated and penetrating
analyses of faith principles, philosophy, and truth. For our 2012 meeting I propose
that we take the occasion to enter into the same sorts of engagements within and
across specific historical and religious boundaries, without topical restriction,
so that we may come to better understand the richness of our own tradition and the
commonalities of thinkers of the religions of the Abrahamic traditions.
Everyone is cordially invited to make a submission for this meeting. While the Program
Committee is particularly interested in submissions addressing issues of the theme,
papers in any area of philosophy are most welcome. All submissions should be sent
via email attachment to the following address:
ACPA Paper Submissions
acpa@stthom.edu or houser@stthom.edu
We look forward to receiving your submissions and to seeing you in Los Angeles.
Yours sincerely,
Richard C. Taylor
Professor of Philosophy
Marquette University,
Visiting Research Professor 2010-11
DeWulf-Mansion Centre for Ancient, Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy,
Hoger Instituut voor Wijsbegeerte, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
ACPA National Office
Center for Thomistic Studies, University of St. Thomas
3800 Montrose Blvd., Houston, TX 77006
Phone: (713) 525-3596 Fax: (713) 942-3483
E-mail: houser@stthom.edu, acpa@stthom.edu
Web: www.acpaweb.org
ACPA Subscription and Membership Services
Philosophy Documentation Center
P.O. Box 7147, Charlottesville, VA 22906-7147
Phone: (800) 444-2419
E-mail: order@pdcnet.org
Web: www.pdcnet.org
Program
Friday, October 28, 2011
7:30 am – Holy Mass
Waterman
9:40-10:00 am – Executive Committee Meeting
Westminster
10:00 am-1:00pm – Executive Council Meeting
Westminster
2:00-8:30 pm – Registration
Conference Center Pre-Function Room
2:00-4:00 pm – Satellite Sessions:
1. International Society for MacIntyrean Enquiry
Westminster
2. Société Internationale pour l’Étude de Philosophie Médiévale I
Kingsbury
3. Society for Catholicism and Analytical Philosophy I
Maryland
4. Gabriel Marcel Society
Plaza
5. Society for the Study of Cardinal Newman
Forsyth
6. The Institute for Saint Anselm Studies
Waterman
7. ACPA Committee on Priestly Formation
Portland
4:30-6:30 pm – Satellite Sessions:
8. Philosophers in Jesuit Education
Westminster
9. Society of Thomistic Personalism I
Portland
10. Conférence Mondiale des Institutions Catholiques de Philosophie
Maryland
11. Société Internationale pour l’Étude de Philosophie Médiévale II
Kingsbury
12. Lonergan Philosophical Society
Waterman
13. Society for Continental Philosophy and Theology
Plaza
14. Society for Thomistic Natural Philosophy
Forsyth
5:00-8:00 pm – Book Exhibit
Lenox
8:00-10:00pm – ACPA Contributed Papers
Session I: The Beginning of the World
Chair: Samuel Condic, University of Mary, Bismarck, North Dakota
Speaker: Travis Dumsday, University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill
“Why Thomistic Philosophy of Nature Implies (Something Like) Big-Bang Cosmology”
Commentator: Tom McLaughlin, St. John Vianney Theological Seminary, Denver
Speaker: Logan Paul Gage, Baylor University
Robert C. Koons, University of Texas at Austin
“St. Thomas on Intelligent Design”
Commentator: Robert Delfino, St. John’s University, New York
Session II: Sensation and the Neural System
Chair: Elizabeth Murray, Loyola Marymount University
Speaker: Daniel D. DeHaan, University of St. Thomas, Houston
“Thomistic Hylomorphism, Self-Determination, and Neuroplasticity: The Case of Addiction”
Commentator: Bernard Prusak, Villanova University
Speaker: Robert E. Wood, University of Dallas
“What is Seeing? A Phenomenological Approach to Neuro-Psychology”
Commentator: Therese Scarpelli Cory, Seattle University
Session III: Lessons from the History of Philosophy
Chair: Lorelle Lamascus, Mexican American Catholic College, San Antonio
Speaker: Erin Stackle, Loyola Marymount University
“‘Fifthly, or Rather First’: Why Aristotle Takes Public Religious Worship
to be Crucial to the Activity of Science”
Commentator: Ben Smith, Aquinas College, Nashville
Speaker: Karen Zwier, University of Pittsburgh
“The Status of Laws of Nature in the Philosophy of Leibniz”
Commentator: James Madden, Benedictine College, Atchison, KS
Session IV: Contemporary Philosophy and Two Classical Doctrines
Chair: João J. Vila-Chã, SJ, Gregorian University
Speaker: Andrew Jaeger, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
“Mental Causation as Teleological Causation”
Commentator: Fr. James Brent, OP, Catholic University of America
Speaker: William Jaworski, Fordham University
“Hylomorphism: What It Is and What It Isn't”
Commentator: Michael Tkacz, Gonzaga University
10:00pm-12 midnight – Reception hosted by St. Louis University
Zodiac
Saturday, October 29, 2011
7:30 am – Holy Mass
Empire
(7:15 Mass is also available at St. Francis Xavier College Church, St. Louis University,
3638 Lindell Blvd., a one mile walk down Lindell Blvd. from the Hotel)
8:30 am-6:00 pm – Registration
Conference Center Pre-Function Room
8:30 am-6:00 pm – Book Exhibit
Lenox
9:00 am-11:15 am – Plenary Session
Empire
Chair: Dominic J. Balestra, Fordham University
Speaker: John Cottingham, Professor Emeritus, University of Reading, Professorial
Research Fellow, Heythrop College, University of London
“Confronting the Cosmos: Scientific Rationality and Human Understanding”
Speaker: Michael Ruse, Florida State University
“Making Room for Faith: Does Science Have Limits?”
11:30am-11:45am – Business Meeting
Empire
12:00pm-1:00pm – Women’s Luncheon
Plaza
(Reservation Required)
1:00-3:00pm – Satellite Sessions:
15. Society for Medieval Logic and Metaphysics
Westminster
16. The Enduring Relevance of Hegel’s Thought
Kingsbury
17. Society of Christian Philosophers
Maryland
18. Honest Dialogue: Honoring the Work of Fr. Ernan McMullin
at the Intersection of Christian Theology and Natural Science
Empire
19. Society of Thomistic Personalism II
Forsyth
20. The Institute for Saint Anselm Studies
Portland
21. Society for Catholicism and Analytic Philosophy II
Waterman
3:30-5:30 pm – ACPA Contributed Papers
Session V: The Logic of Science
Chair: Julian Davies, OFM, Siena College
Speaker: Christopher Brown, University of Tennessee, Martin
“Some Logical Problems for Scientism”
Commentator: Craig Condella, Salve Regina University
Speaker: Michael Krom, St. Vincent College
“Modeling the Dialogue between Science, Philosophy, and Religion: Aquinas on the
Origins and Development of the Universe”
Commentator: Steven Snyder, Christendom College
Session VI: Replies to Two Contemporary Arguments
Chair: Br. William Rehg, SJ, St. Louis University
Speaker: Alexander R. Pruss, Baylor University
“A New Way to Reconcile Creation with Current Biological Science”
Commentator: Marie George, St. John’s University, NY
Speaker: T. Ryan Byerly, Baylor University
“Intentions, Intentionally Permitting, and the Problem of Evil”
Commentator: Alexander Eodice, Iona College
Session VII: Science: Modern and Ancient
Chair: Mary Catherine Sommers, Center for Thomistic Studies,
University of St. Thomas, Houston
Speaker: Paul Symington, Franciscan University of Steubenville
“Thomas Aquinas, Perceptual Resemblance, Categories, and the Reality of Secondary
Qualities”
Commentator: Stephen Striby, Marian University
Speaker: Michael Storck, Ohio Dominican University
“Cogs, Dogs, and Robot Frogs: Aquinas’s Presence by Power and the Unity of Living
Things”
Commentator: Anthony Crifasi, Benedictine College, Atchison, KS
Session VIII: A Living Thomism
Chair: Jack Carlson, Creighton University
Speaker: R. Mary Hayden Lemmons, University of St. Thomas, Minnesota
“Indeterminacy and the Normativity of Practical Reason”
Commentator: Daniel Thero, College of St. Rose
Speaker: Vincent J. DeVendra, Boston College
“A Science With No Scientists?: Faith and the First Principles of Aquinas' Sacra
Doctrina”
Commentator: R.E. Houser, Center for Thomistic Studies,
University of St. Thomas, Houston
6:00-7:00pm – Holy Mass
Empire
7:00-7:30pm – Reception hosted by St. Louis University
Zodiac
7:30-9:30pm – ACPA Banquet
Starlight Ballroom
Presentation of the ACPA Young Scholar’s Award:
Travis Dumsday
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill
Introduction of the Aquinas Medalist: Eleonore Stump, St. Louis University
Aquinas Medalist: Jorge J.E. Gracia, State University of New York, Buffalo
Medalist’s Address: "Does Philosophy Have a Role to Play in Contemporary Society?
The Challenges of Science and Culture".
Sunday, October 30, 2011
7:30am – Holy Mass
Empire
8:30am-12:30am – Book Exhibit
Lenox
9:30-11:30am – Plenary Session
Empire
Chair: Richard C. Taylor, Marquette University
Speaker: John F. Haught, Georgetown University
“Darwin, Faith and Critical Intelligence.”
Speaker: Dominic J. Balestra, Fordham University
“Galileo’s Legacy: Getting the Relationship In-Between Scientism and Literalism
Right”
Abstracts of Contributed Papers
Session I: The Beginning of the World
“Why Thomistic Philosophy of Nature Implies (Something Like) Big-Bang Cosmology”
Travis Dumsday, University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill
I argue that the combination of two commitments present in Thomistic philosophy
of nature, namely hylomorphism and a relationist ontology of space, entail that
there must have been a first material entity; that is, a material entity which was
temporally preceded by no other entities, coexisted with no others, and temporally
preceded all subsequent material entities. This is also a core component of big-bang
cosmology. In addition I explore some implications for natural theology.
“St. Thomas on Intelligent Design”
Logan Paul Gage, Baylor University
Robert C. Koons, University of Texas at Austin
The ‘intelligent design’ (ID) movement—which includes figures such as Phillip E.
Johnson, William A. Dembski, and Michael Behe—has challenged the claim of many in
the scientific establishment that nature gives no empirical signs of having been
deliberately designed. In particular, ID arguments in biology dispute the notion
that neo-Darwinian evolution is the only viable scientific explanation of the origin
of biological novelty, arguing that there are telltale signs of the activity of
intelligence which can be recognized and studied empirically. In recent years, a
number of Catholic philosophers, theologians, and scientists have expressed opposition
to ID. Some of these critics claim that there is a conflict between the philosophy
of St. Thomas Aquinas and that of the ID movement, and even an affinity between
Aquinas’s ideas and theistic Darwinism. We consider five such criticisms and find
each wanting.
[Return to Program]
Session II: Sensation and the Neural System
“Thomistic Hylomorphism, Self-Determination, and Neuroplasticity: The Case of Addiction”
Daniel D. DeHaan, University of St. Thomas – Houston
In this paper I will suggest that neuroplasticity and other forms of physiological
alterations are often the result of the rational decisions formed by human action.
Through acting we become, in a certain respect, what we do. I will argue that the
self-determination involved in human action commits Thomists to the position that,
in acting, we not only become psychically inclined to good or evil activities, but
that we also become somatically and physiologically ordered to these activities.
I will contend that the somatic manifestations of self-determination, along with
the hylomorphic ontology it presupposes, are verified, and indeed offer the best
interpretation of such phenomena as neural plasticity. I will be using addiction
as a paradigmatic instance of neural plasticity, which reveals what happens to the
nervous system and psychological faculties of a hylomorphic entity who partakes
in acts deprived of moral goodness.
“What is Seeing? A Phenomenological Approach to Neuro-Psychology”
Robert E. Wood, University of Dallas
With a myriad of others, Francis Crick has sought the nature of the soul in the
observable functioning of the nervous system, beginning with seeing. In contrast,
this paper explores the nature of the soul through the grounding of the act of seeing
in the power of seeing as its “soul” and folds in the kinds of attention we pay
through seeing. We begin with the eidetic characteristics of the visual field. We
then explore three theoretical positions on where what is seen presents itself:
within the brain, on things, or between awareness and things. What makes possible
the appearance of things is the self-presence of the seer revealed in the nature
of touch which suffuses the functional, self-directive body. Objectifying the eyes
by the ophthalmologist abstracts from their essential expressivity and from the
speech that can explain that expression. In the situation of encounter, focus upon
the empirical features breaks the character of the encounter where we live “outside”
ourselves and within the space of common meaning expressed in language. Even in
the empirical focus, the ophthalmologist recognizes, through her seeing, deviations
from normality of functioning and uses techniques that follow from her having intellectually
mastered the field of practice. As a native power, seeing is a universal orientation
towards all instances of the colored kind, cutting through the problem of universals
by finding them in powers and correlative kinds. Recognition of this is made possible
by the functioning of the notion of Being that grounds both intellectual and volitional
activities. A concluding section explores several tasks for neuro-psychological
research and expands into the grounds of a general cosmology centered upon the free
and intelligent commitment of neuro-psychologists.
[Return to Program]
Session III: Lessons from the History of Philosophy
“‘Fifthly, or Rather First’: Why Aristotle Takes Public Religious Worship to be
Crucial to the Activity of Science”
Erin Stackle, Loyola Marymount University
In his Politics, Aristotle identifies the public worship of the gods as the most
important element of the city, but then immediately follows this claim with the
claim that justice is the most important element of the city. I first consider the
various possible ways of interpreting this claim on the basis of Aristotle’s metaphysical
commitments. I then consider what Aristotle actually says about religious worship.
The things Aristotle says when elaborating public worship in the city indicated
that the importance of this public worship to the city is in establishing leisure
necessary for, and turning the citizens toward, contemplation. This contemplation,
the activity of science, is, as Aristotle elaborates in the Nicomachean Ethics,
the most divine activity in which we can engage. Public religious worship, then,
is essential to the activity of science in a city.
“The Status of Laws of Nature in the Philosophy of Leibniz”
Karen R. Zwier, University of Pittsburgh
Is it possible to take the enterprise of physics seriously while also holding the
belief that the world contains an order beyond the reach of that physics? Is it
possible to simultaneously believe in objective laws of nature and in miracles?
Is it possible to search for the truths of physics while also acknowledging the
limitations of that search as it is carried out by limited human knowers? As a philosopher,
as a Christian, and as a participant in the physics of his day, Leibniz had an interesting
view that bears on all of these questions. This paper examines the status of laws
of nature in Leibniz’s philosophy and how the status of these laws fits into his
larger philosophical picture of the limits of human knowledge and the wise and omniscient
God who created the actual world.
[Return to Program]
Session IV: Contemporary Philosophy and Two Classical Doctrines
“Mental Causation as Teleological Causation”
Andrew Jaeger, University of Nebraska – Lincoln
I argue that the Causal Closure Argument (CCA) and the Explanatory Exclusion Argument
(EEA) fail to show that mental causes must either be reduced to physical causes
or that mental causes are epiphenomenal. I begin by granting the soundness of CCA
and EEA and go on to argue that they only rule out irreducible mental efficient
causes/explanations. A proponent of irreducible mental causation can, therefore,
grant the soundness of CCA and EEA, provided she holds mental causation/explanation
to be teleological. I then go on to argue that, in light of these two objections,
such an account of mental causation is possible and should be taken seriously. I
conclude by giving a cursory sketch of how such a picture of mental causation as
teleological causation would look. The upshot being that this general approach to
mental causation, as non-reductive and non-epiphenomenal, cannot be undermined by
the CCA and EEA.
“Hylomorphism: What It Is and What It Isn't”
William Jaworski, Fordham University
‘Hylomorphism’ has recently become a buzzword in metaphysics. Kit Fine, Kathryn
Koslicki, and Mark Johnston, among others, have argued that hylomorphism provides
an account of parthood and material constitution that has certain advantages over
its competitors. But what exactly is it, and what are its implications for an account
of what we are? Hylomorphism, I argue, is fundamentally a claim about structure.
It says that structure is a basic ontological and explanatory principle. I argue
that hylomorphism is compatible with physicalism, and also with substance dualism,
and epiphenomenalism. The most interesting kinds of hylomorphism nevertheless reject
these views. I describe one such hylomorphic theory. It is an empirically well-warranted
theory, I argue, one based on work in biology and biological subdisciplines such
as neuroscience.
[Return to Program]
Session V: The Logic of Science
“Some Logical Problems for Scientism”
Christopher Brown, University of Tennessee at Martin
This paper focuses on a way of criticizing scientism to which a potential advocate
of the position should be particularly sensitive. By looking at nine different ways
of defining scientism, I show that potential definitions of scientism conform to
a general pattern: a description of scientism either is self-defeating or else it
can’t really count as a construal of scientism in the first place. Advocates for
the experimental sciences would therefore be better off accepting a middle position—one
might say a broadly Thomistic approach to science—between the extremes of scientism
on the one hand and a religious fundamentalism that ignores the important contribution
of the experimental sciences on the other. Such a middle position recognizes both
the intellectual significance and inherent limitations of the scientific method
employed within the experimental sciences.
“Modeling the Dialogue between Science, Philosophy, and Religion: Aquinas on the
Origins and Development of the Universe”
Michael P. Krom, Saint Vincent College, Latrobe, PA
St. Thomas Aquinas is an acknowledged model for anyone who wants to understand the
dynamics of faith and reason as compatible and collaborative partners in the search
for Truth. Further, his extensive reflections over the course of his intellectual
development on the theme of Creation make him a fruitful source for understanding
the contemporary science and religion dialogue on the origins and development of
the universe. What follows is a discussion of Aquinas’ views on Creation with an
eye toward contemporary scientific theory. It would be wrong-headed to attempt to
‘discover’ that Aquinas was “the first Evolutionist/Big Bang Theorist” (as Lord
Acton found him the “First Whig”), and yet we might be surprised to find how open
his philosophical speculations are in this regard. And hopefully the lovers of Truth
who wrongly reject Christianity as a result of this love are willing to be surprised
by his perennial philosophy.
[Return to Program]
Session VI: Replies to Two Contemporary Arguments
“A New Way to Reconcile Creation with Current Biological Science”
Alexander R. Pruss, Baylor University
I shall argue for the counterintuitive claim that current biological science can
be reconciled with the claim that God miraculously intervened in the development
of the human species.
“Intentions, Intentionally Permitting, and the Problem of Evil”
T. Ryan Byerly, Baylor University
Some of the most persuasive contemporary statements of the problem of evil rely
on premises concerning God’s intentionally permitting certain things to occur and
premises concerning the moral wrongness of intentionally permitting such things.
In this paper, I want to pose a dilemma for the defender of such arguments from
evil. Either intentionally permitting p implies intending p or it doesn’t. If it
does, then the theist may plausibly resist these arguments from evil by insisting
that the key claims in them concerning God’s intentionally permitting things are
false. But, if intentionally permitting p does not imply intending p, then the theist
may plausibly resist these arguments by contesting the premises in them which make
claims concerning the moral wrongness of intentionally permitting certain things.
Either way, the theist will have a response to these versions of the problem of
evil.
[Return to Program]
Session VII: Science: Modern and Ancient
“Thomas Aquinas, Perceptual Resemblance, Categories, and the Reality of Secondary
Qualities”
Paul Symington, Franciscan University of Steubenville
Arguably one of the most fundamental phase shifts that occurred in the intellectual
history of Western culture involved the ontological reduction of secondary qualities
to primary qualities. To say the least, this reduction worked to undermine the foundations
undergirding Aristotelian thought in support of a scientific view of the world based
strictly on an examination of the real—primary—qualities of things. In this essay,
I identify the so-called “Causal Argument” for a reductive view of secondary qualities
and seek to deflect this challenge by deriving some plausible consequences that
support a non-reductive view of secondary qualities from an Aristotelian view (via
the philosophical commentary of Thomas Aquinas). Specifically, my argument has two
facets. First, I show that Aristotle’s view both implies recognition of the extramental
existence of secondary qualities and is a prima facia natural view to take regarding
the ontology of secondary qualities. Second, I show that the Causal Argument, which
is thought to undermine a natural view of secondary qualities as real things, loses
its bite when one examines perception in light the ontological relationship among
the categories of quality, quantity and substance.
“Cogs, Dogs, and Robot Frogs: Aquinas's Presence by Power and the Unity of Living
Things”
Michael Storck, Ohio Dominican University
In this paper, I investigate the nature of complex bodies, especially living things.
I argue that a living thing's complexity is fundamentally different from that of
a machine, so that living things are substances, while machines are not. I further
argue that the best way to understand the unity and complexity of a living thing
is to follow Aquinas in holding that the elements and other parts are present in
wholes by their powers, rather than as substances. I show that presence by power
is not refuted by the discoveries of modern physics, and that it can help us understand
the relations between parts and wholes in a more universal way which includes both
living and non-living things.
[Return to Program]
Session VIII: A Living Thomism
“Indeterminacy and the Normativity of Practical Reason”
R. Mary Hayden Lemmons, University of St. Thomas – Minnesota
This paper argues against the indeterminacy thesis that attempts to defeat natural
law by asserting that specific moral norms cannot be based on human nature. As put
by Jean Porter (Nature as Reason 2005, 338): “the intelligibilities of human
nature underdetermine their forms of expression, and that is why this theory does
not yield a comprehensive set of determinate moral norms, compelling to all rational
persons.” However, if this were so, one could adopt any morality with impunity from
nature’s sanctions. But I argue that nature punishes violators of the natural law
in various ways. In addition, I argue that the indeterminacy thesis cannot be supported
by appealing to the diversity of moral norms across the globe. Such diversity is
required, for instance, both by the reliance of Thomistic natural law on the practical
syllogism and by its reliance on practical reason’s ability to prescribe for the
sake of the person in highly unique situations as required by Wojtyla’s Personalistic
Norm and Aquinas’s norm of neighborly love.
“A Science With No Scientists?: Faith and the First Principles of Aquinas' Sacra
Doctrina”
Vincent J. DeVendra, Boston College
The first question of Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologiae makes the argument that sacred
doctrine is an Aristotelian science, and furthermore, the most certain of sciences.
According to Aristotle, this means that the first principles of sacred science must
be certain. The normal modes of grasping the certainty of principles are either
by demonstrating them by a higher science or by a direct grasp of them by the natural
light of the agent intellect, and yet both of these avenues are closed to sacred
science. It would seem, then, that if sacred doctrine is a science, it can have
no scientists in the wayfaring state. Aquinas unties this knot by proposing a third
way of grasping the certainty of the first principles, namely, faith. Only through
the supernatural and graced assent of faith can the articles of faith be known as
certain and allow sacred doctrine to fit the mold of an Aristotelian science.
[Return to Program]
Satellite Sessions
Friday, October 28, 2011 - 2:00 - 4:00 pm
1. International Society for MacIntyrean Enquiry
Westminster
Organizer: Jeffery Nicholas, Mount Angel Seminary
Topic: MacIntyre on Reason, Faith, and Error
Chair: Greg Beabout, St. Louis University
Speaker: Bruce Ballard, Lincoln University
“MacIntyre on Moral Error as a Source of Intellectual Error”
Commentator: Michael O'Neill, Providence College
Speaker: Christopher Lutz, St. Meinrad Seminary and School of Theology
“Faith and Reason in MacIntyrean Enquiry”
Commentator: Bryan Cross, St. Louis University
2. Société Internationale pour l’Étude de Philosophie Médiévale (SIEPM) I
Kingsbury
Organizer: Richard C. Taylor, Marquette University
Topic: Philosophy in the Abrahamic Traditions 1.
Chair: Jörg Tellkamp, Universidad Antónoma Metropolitana, Mexico City
Speaker: Daniel DeHaan, University of St. Thomas, Houston.
“Where does Avicena Demonstrate the Existence of God?”
Commentator: E. M. Macierowski, Benedictine College
Speaker: Emma Gannagé, Georgetown University
“Medicine as a subordinate science”
Commentator: Therese-Anne Druart, The Catholic University of America
3. Society for Catholicism and Analytical Philosophy I
Maryland
Organizer: Gavin Colvert, Assumption College
Topic: Author Meets Critics: Alexander Pruss's Actuality, Possibility and Worlds
Chair: Patrick Toner, Wake Forest University
Speaker: David Robb, Davidson College
Speaker: Jonathan Jacobs, St. Louis University
Speaker: Joshua Rasmussen, University of Notre Dame
Respondent: Alexander Pruss, Baylor University
4. Gabriel Marcel Society
Plaza
Organizer and Chair: Brendan Sweetman, Rockhurst University
Speaker: David Rodick, Xavier University
“Gabriel Marcel and American Philosophy”
Speaker: Jill Graper Hernandez, University of Texas, San Antonio
“The ‘Death of God’ as the birth of Marcelian Ethics”
5. Society for the Study of Cardinal Newman
Forsyth
Organizer and Chair: Michael Baur, Fordham University
Topic: Newman and Development
Speaker: Kenneth L. Parker, Saint Louis University
“Newman, Development, and Historical Consciousness”
Speaker: C. Michael Shea, Saint Louis University
“Sinning Through an Excess of Faith: Newman's 1845 Essay on Development
in Light of the Philosophy of Louis Bautain”
Speaker: Michael Baur, Fordham University
“Newman, Development, and Evolution”
6. The Metaphysical Society of America
Waterman
Organizer and Chair: Vincent Colapietro, Penn State University
Speaker: Phillip Stambovsky, Fairfield University
“The Science of Cause—Modern vs. Medieval—in Philosophy of Religion”
Speaker: James Earley, Department of Chemistry, Georgetown University
“Darwin’s ‘Gift to Religion’ Calls for a Whiteheadian Response”
Speaker: Nicholas Cohen, Urshan Graduate School of Theology
“Truth and Necessity in Anselmian Human Redemption”
7. ACPA Committee on Priestly Formation
Portland
Chair: David Ruel Foster, Athenaeum of Ohio
Speaker: Jack Carlson, Creighton University
“The Importance of Precision in Philosophy and Theology”
Speaker: Patricia Pintado, Pontifical College Josephinum
“Guidelines for Seminary Studies in Philosophy: History and Content of the New Decree.”
Friday, 28 October 2011 – 4:30 - 6:30 pm
8. Philosophers in Jesuit Education
Westminster
Organizer: Joseph Godfrey, SJ,, St. Joseph’s University
Topic: Medical Ethics
Chair: William Rehg, SJ, Saint Louis University
Speaker: John Kavanaugh, SJ, Saint Louis University
“Are There Some Human Beings Who Are Not Persons?
A Looming Controversy in Medical Ethics: A Discussion”
9. Society of Thomistic Personalism I
Portland
Organizer and Chair: R.M. Lemmons, University of St. Thomas, Minnesota
Speaker: Joseph Koterski, SJ, Fordham University
“W. Norris Clarke on the Soul: The Significance of Ethics for Metaphysics”
Speaker: Eleonore Stump, St. Louis University
“Suffering and Personal Growth in Aquinas”
10. COMIUCAP - Conférence Mondiale des Institutions Catholiques de Philosophie
Maryland
Organizer and Chair: João J. Vila-Chã, SJ, Gregorian University
Topic: The Role of Philosophy in the Contemporary Catholic Context
Speaker: Oliva Blanchette, Boston College
"Maurice Blondel and the Catholic Need for Philosophy"
Response: Dominic Balestra, Fordham University
"Where is Catholic Philosophy Today?"
Speaker: Arthur Madigan, SJ, Boston College
"Philosophy and Catholic Modernity"
Response: João Vila-Chã, SJ, Gregorian University
"The Networking of Catholic Philosophy"
11. Société Internationale pour l’Étude de Philosophie Médiévale (SIEPM) II
Kingsbury
Organizer: Richard C. Taylor, Marquette University, Milwaukee
Topic: Philosophy in the Abrahamic Traditions 2.
Chair:
Speaker: Sarah Pessin, University of Denver.
“Hylomorphism and Philosophy of Religion?
Matter, Metaphysics and Theology in Muslim Philosophy”
Commentator: David Twetten, Marquette University
Speaker: Richard C. Taylor, Marquette University
“Albert the Great and the Development of Thomas Aquinas’s Natural Epistemology”
Commentator: Jörg Tellkamp, Universidad Antónoma Metropolitana, Mexico City
12. Lonergan Philosophical Society
Waterman
Organizer: Elizabeth Murray, Loyola Marymount University
Topic: Dimensions of Lonergan's Thought
Chair: Michael Sharkey, University of Wisconsin—Platteville
Speaker: Randy Rosenberg, Fontbonne University, St. Louis
“Walker Percy on Faith and Reason: An Examination in Light of Lonergan”
Commentator: Gretchen Gusich, Loyola Marymount University
Speaker: Paul St. Amour, St. Joseph's University
“Lonergan's Economics and Cosmopolis”
Commentator: Thomas Cappelli, Loyola Marymount University
14. Society for Continental Philosophy and Theology
Plaza
Organizer and Chair: Jeffrey Hanson, Australian Catholic University
Topic: Celebrating the Fiftieth Anniversary of Totality and Infinity
Speaker: Jeffrey Bloechl, Boston College
“Totality and Infinity as Philosophy of Religion”
Speaker: Jeffrey Hanson, Australian Catholic University
“Being at Home with Totality and Infinity”
Adriaan T. Peperzak, Loyola University, Chicago
“What I’ve Learned from Reading Totality and Infinity”
14. Society for Thomistic Natural Philosophy
Forsyth
Organizer and Chair: Michael Tkacz, Gonzaga University
Speaker: Steven E. Baldner, St. Francis Xavier University
“Creation, Time and Causality: Albertus Magnus and Thomas Aquinas”
Commentary: Michael W. Tkacz, Gonzaga University
“Albertus Magnus, Cosmogony and the Error Platonis”
Saturday, October 29, 2011 – 1:00-3:00pm
15. Society for Medieval Logic and Metaphysics
Westminster
Organizer: Gyula Klima, Fordham University
Topic: Efficient Causality
Chair: Michael Rota, University of St. Thomas, Minnesota
Speaker: Edward Feser, Pasadena City College
“The Medieval Principle of Motion and the Modern Principle of Inertia”
Speaker: Gyula Klima, Fordham University
“Whatever Happened to Efficient Causes?”
16. The Enduring Relevance of Hegel's Thought
Kingsbury
Organizer and Chair: Robert Wood, University of Dallas
Topic: Hegel's Political Thought
Speaker: Adriaan Peperzak, Loyola University of Chicago
“Hegel's Faith and his Conception of the Relations between
the Practice of Right and the Supremacy of Theory”
Speaker: Jeffery Kinlaw, McMurry University
“Hegel’s Theory of Action: Agent-relativity and Agent-neutrality.”
Commentator: Michael Baur, Fordham University
17. Society of Christian Philosophers
Maryland
Organizer and Chair: Stephen R. Grimm, Fordham University
Speaker: Eleonore Stump, St. Louis University
“The Nature of Love and the Anselmian Theory of Atonement”
Speaker: Charity Anderson, St. Louis University
“Fallibilism and the Flexibility of Epistemic Modals”
18. Honest Dialogue: Honoring the Work of Fr. Ernan McMullin at the Intersection
of
Christian Theology and Natural Science
Empire
Organizer: Patrick McDonald, Seattle Pacific University.
Chair: Teresa I. Reed, Quincy University
Speaker: Paul Allen, Concordia University, Montreal
“McMullin's Augustinian Settlement: The Consonance between Faith and Science”
Speaker: Rob Deltete, Seattle University
“McMullin on Anthropic Explanation in Cosmology”
Speaker: Patrick McDonald, Seattle Pacific University
“Evolutionary Biology and a Theology of the Human”
Speaker: Brendan Sweetman, Rockhurst University
“The Dispute between Plantinga and McMullin over Evolution”
19. Society of Thomistic Personalism II
Forsyth
Organizer and Chair: R.M. Lemmons, University of St. Thomas, Minnesota
Speaker: Alice Ramos, St. John's University
“The Affections and the Life of the Mind”
Speaker: Mirela Oliva, University of St. Thomas, Houston
“Beauty in Gadamer and Aquinas”
20. The Institute for Saint Anselm Studies
Portland
Organizer and Chair: Montague Brown, St. Anselm College
Topic: Philosophical Implications of Anselm's Prayers and Meditations.
Speaker: Katherin Rogers, University of Delaware
“Anselm on Self-reflection in Theory and Practice”
Speaker: Eileen Sweeney, Boston College
“Anselmian Meditation: Imagination, Argument and Aporia.”
Speaker: Nicholas Cohen, Urshan Graduate School of Theology
“Truth and Necessity in Anselmian Human Redemption”
21. Society for Catholicism and Analytical Philosophy II
Waterman
Organizer and Chair: Patrick Toner, Wake Forest University
Topic: Providence
Speaker: Thomas Flint, University of Notre Dame
“Freedom, Foreknowledge, and Keeping Dialectically Kosher”
Speaker: Neal Judisch, University of Oklahoma
“Meticulous Providence and Gratuitous Evil”
Commentator: W. Matthews Grant, University of St. Thomas, Minnesota
ACPA 2011-2012 Nominees for Office
Here are short biographies for the candidates for office. Those members whose dues
are currently paid up will receive their paper ballot in the “September mailing.”
You should receive your ballot by regular mail around 15 September. You will have
from the date you receive your ballot until 2 April 2012 to vote. Instructions for
voting will be included with your ballot, as well as an envelope you can use to
return your completed ballot. As usual, you will be asked to vote for one person
for VP/President-Elect and for at most five persons for the Executive Council.
For VP/ President-Elect
Daniel O. Dahlstrom (Ph.D., St. Louis University) is a Professor in the Department
of Philosophy, Boston University, where he served as chair from 2007 to 2011. A
former president of the Metaphysical Society of America (2009-10), he has also served
as secretary of the ACPA (1980-1987) and on the ACPA's annual program committees
and on various committees of the APA and SPEP. He is the author of numerous articles
and three books, most recently, Philosophical Legacies (CUA Press, 2008).
In addition to translating works of Mendelssohn, Schiller, Hegel, Feuerbach, Husserl,
and Heidegger, he has edited several editions, including most recently Interpreting
Heidegger: Critical Essays (Cambridge, 2011).
Elizabeth A. Murray (Loyola Marymount University). Since 2010, she has held
the Robert H. Taylor Chair in Philosophy at Loyola Marymount University. She is
a Professor of Philosophy at Loyola Marymount University, and former Chair of the
Philosophy Department (2006-2010). She received her Ph.D. in Philosophy at the University
of Toronto in 1981. She specializes in the philosophy of Bernard Lonergan, S.J.,
and in existential phenomenology. Her current thematic interests include fundamental
moods, rational self-consciousness, and modes of conversion. Her publications include
The Lonergan Reader, co-edited with Mark Morelli (University of Toronto Press,
1997); Bernard Lonergan, SJ, Understanding and Being: The Halifax Lectures on Insight,
transcribed and co-edited with Mark Morelli (Edwin Mellen Press, 1980), re-edited
with Morelli, Crowe, Doran, and Daly and published as Volume 5 of Collected Works
of Bernard Lonergan (University of Toronto Press, 1990); Anxiety: The Affectivity
of Moral Consciousness (UPA, 1986); and many articles and book chapters
on Lonergan, and on other thinkers including Sartre, Freud, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche.
She teaches graduate level courses in Lonergan and Kierkegaard, and undergraduate
courses in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Existentialism, and Phenomenology. She was
a founder and served on the editorial board of the Method: Journal of Lonergan Studies
(1983 – 1991). She founded the Lonergan Philosophical Society in 1993, and is its
current President. From 1992-2006, she served as the LMU faculty representative
to the Lilly Fellows Program in Humanities and the Arts, and she was elected to
its National Network Board (1995-99). In 1993, she co-founded with Tom Buckley,
SJ, ‘Western Conversations,’ which involves faculty of the six Jesuit universities
of the western U.S. in semi-annual conferences. She was elected to the National
Seminar on Jesuit Higher Education and served as a member of the editorial board
of Conversations (2001-04). She currently serves on the ACPA Executive Council.
For Executive Council
Michael Baur is Associate Professor of Philosophy and Adjunct Professor of
Law at Fordham University. He holds a Ph.D. from the University of Toronto (1991),
and a J.D. from Harvard Law School (1998). A Life Member of the ACPA, he has served
two terms as National Secretary, and two years as Interim Secretary, of the Association.
In addition to presenting papers at past meetings of the ACPA, he has published
articles in the ACPQ and has organized ACPA satellite sessions of the Society
for the Study of Cardinal Newman. He is currently Secretary of the Hegel Society
of America, and Vice-President/President-elect of Philosophers in Jesuit Education.
His main areas of research include German Idealism, the philosophy of law, and contemporary
continental thought. Recent scholarly work includes: The Blackwell Companion to Hegel
(2011; co-edited with Stephen Houlgate); Person, Being, and History: Essays in Honor
of Kenneth L. Schmitz (CUA Press, 2011; co-edited with Robert E. Wood);
and the “Natural Law” chapter in the Oxford Handbook of Aquinas (forthcoming
2011).
Craig A. Condella (Salve Regina University). Condella received his Ph.D.
from Fordham University where he was awarded a Senior Teaching Fellowship, an Alumni
Dissertation Fellowship, and a Post-Doctoral Teaching Fellowship. In 2006, he was
hired as an Assistant Professor at Salve Regina University where he currently teaches
on both a graduate and undergraduate level. He has published in the area of the
philosophy of technology and has more recently been focusing on the connection between
environmental ethics and aesthetics. He recently founded the Rhode Island Beta chapter
of Phi Sigma Tau and has twice organized satellite sessions at the ACPA annual meeting.
Jean De Groot (Catholic University of America) is associate professor in
the School of Philosophy at the Catholic University of America, where she has taught
full time since 1994. She received her Ph.D. from Harvard University in History
of Science (1980). She works in ancient Greek philosophy, philosophy of nature,
and history and philosophy of science. At Catholic University, she was associate
dean in charge of the undergraduate program in the School of Philosophy from 2000-2008.
She designed the School of Philosophy’s successful four-part discussion series for
undergraduates at CUA, Exploring Faith and Forming Intellect (2003). She
served on the President’s Task Force on Faculty Salaries, gave presentations on
Catholic mission to the Division of Student Life at the request of the Vice-President
for Student Life, and served as president of the local chapter of Phi Beta Kappa
for four years. Her graduate courses focus on texts of Aristotle–Categories,
Physics, and Posterior Analytics–as well as 20th century philosophy
of science and Wittgenstein. She has published articles in journals such as Phronesis,
Journal of the History of Philosophy, and Studies in History and Philosophy
of Science, as well as many book chapters. She has published two books,
Aristotle and Philoponus on Light, and Nature in American Philosophy
(ed.). She is presently writing a book, Aristotle’s Empiricism: Experience and Mechanics
in the 4th Century B.C.
Alexander Eodice (Iona College). He holds a Ph.D. (1987) from Fordham University
and is a Professor of Philosophy at Iona, where he has served as Chair of the Philosophy
Department, Director of the Honors Program and, from 2001-2008, as Dean of the School
of Arts and Science. During the Hilary term 2009, he was visiting scholar at Blackfriars
Hall, Oxford University where he conducted research and delivered a lecture on “Legal
Obligation and Coercion”. He regularly teaches courses in moral philosophy, philosophy
of law, and philosophy of mind and has published articles in various journals including
Vera Lex: International Journal of Natural Law and Right, Philosophy Today,
and Proceedings of the ACPA; recent publications include “Keeping Time in
Mind: Saint Augustine’s Proposed Solution to a Perplexing Problem” in Augustine and
Philosophy (Lexington Books, 2010). He was a member of the ACPA Program
Committee 2011.
John Greco received his AB from Georgetown University in 1983 and his Ph.D.
from Brown University in 1989. He holds the Leonard and Elizabeth Eslick Chair in
Philosophy at Saint Louis University. He taught at Fordham University from 1989
to 2006. He has previously served on the Executive Council of ACPA and on the Executive
Committee of the SCP, and has chaired or served on various program committees for
the ACPA, SCP and APA. He also served on the Committee on Lectures, Publications
and Research for the APA, and on the Advisory Board for the APA Eastern Division.
He is currently on the Editorial Boards of APQ and International Journal for
the Study of Skepticism, and was recently a guest editor for The Modern Schoolman.
His areas of research are epistemology, metaphysics, and philosophy of religion.
Publications include Achieving Knowledge: A Virtue-theoretic Account of Epistemic
Normativity (Cambridge, 2010); Putting Skeptics in Their Place: The Nature of
Skeptical Arguments and Their Role in Philosophical Inquiry (Cambridge
2000); The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology, co-ed. (Blackwell 1999); The Oxford
Handbook of Skepticism, ed. (Oxford 2007); and Rationality and the Good,
co-ed. (Oxford, 2007).
Paulette Kidder (Seattle University). Paulette Kidder received her PhD in
Philosophy from Boston College in 1990. She has been a member of the Philosophy
Department at Seattle University since 1989. From 1999 to 2008, she served as Associate
Dean of Faculty in the College of Arts and Sciences at Seattle University and she
was Interim Dean of the College from 2008-2009. Dr. Kidder’s publications have focused
on the work of Bernard Lonergan, SJ, with an emphasis on the dialogue between Lonergan’s
work and contemporary movements in feminism, liberalism, and post-modernism. She
has taught a range of courses in Seattle University’s Core program as well as its
University Honors Program and Philosophy major. Her most recent teaching interest
is in Bioethics.
Tanya Loughead (Canisius College). Loughead is Associate Professor of Philosophy
at Canisius College, a Jesuit liberal arts college in Buffalo, New York. She also
taught for a number of years at Creighton University. She completed her Masters
and PhD degrees at the Catholic University of Leuven in Belgium. At Canisius, Loughead
co-founded and runs programs on Ethics and Justice and is working to establish an
Institute for Ethics & Justice. She specializes in the area of Contemporary
Continental Philosophy and is interested in scholarship and teaching on justice.
Loughead has published articles on the works of Maurice Blanchot, Emmanuel Levinas,
Simone Weil, Jacques Derrida and Jean-Luc Marion, amongst others. In 2008, she presented
a paper on Derrida and friendship at the national ACPA meeting and she has presented
papers at her regional ACPA meetings. At Canisius, Loughead has been the Chair of
the Fulbright Committee and is an elected member of the Core Curriculum Committee.
She recently won a 'professor of the year' award from the Women Studies Program.
Loughead has been on the board of the Radical Philosophy Association, has served
on the RPA Program Committee and is hosting their 2012 conference in Buffalo.
Julie McDonald (Saint Joseph’s University, Philadelphia). McDonald received
her Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame. Prior to joining the SJU faculty, she
taught at St. Norbert College and Villanova University. She is an Assistant Professor
and Chair of the Philosophy Department at SJU. She has published articles on moral
theory, and edited an anthology, Contemporary Moral Problems in a Diverse Society
(Wadsworth 1998). Her most recent work is in the area of disability studies. She
is also preparing an anthology on food and justice.
Constance Mui (Loyola University, New Orleans) received her Ph.D. from Brown
University. She is Professor of Philosophy and holds the Rev. Scott Youree Watson,
S.J., Distinguished Professorship in Philosophy. She has published articles on Husserl,
Sartre, Marcel, de Beauvoir, Strawson, and feminist theory, and is co-editor of
Gender Struggles: Practical Approaches to Contemporary Feminism (2002). She
has attended and presented at numerous AJCU conferences and workshops on Jesuit
pedagogy and on the role of philosophy in Jesuit liberal education. At Loyola, she
has served as Director of the University Honors Program and as Department Chair.
She has also served as President of the North American Sartre Society (2004-07),
and was a member of the Diversity Committee of the Society of Phenomenology and
Existential Philosophy (SPEP, 2001-05). She is currently President of the Central
Division Sartre Circle, and reviews editor of Sartre Studies International.
Theresa W. Tobin (Marquette University). She is Assistant Professor of Philosophy
at Marquette University (since 2005). Her research is in contemporary ethics, with
an emphasis on global ethics and feminist ethics. Published articles on these topics
include: “On Their Own Ground: Strategies of Resistance for Sunni Muslim Women”
(Hypatia, 2007), “Using Rights to Counter ‘Gender-Specific’ Wrongs” (Human
Rights Review, 2008), and “The Relevance of Trust for Moral Justification”
(forthcoming in Social Theory and Practice fall 2011). She has additional
scholarly interest in thinkers from the Catholic intellectual tradition, especially
Gabriel Marcel. Publications in this area include, “Taming Augustine’s Monstrosity:
Aquinas’s Notion of ‘Use’ in the Struggle for Moral Growth,” (Journal of Philosophical
Research, 2009) and “Toward an Epistemology of Mysticism: Knowing God as
Mystery” (International Philosophical Quarterly, 2010). Her current research
project is a co-authored book on methodology in ethics. She is passionate about
teaching, and has a forthcoming essay on pedagogy entitled “Transformative Education
in a Broken World: Feminist and Jesuit Pedagogy on the Importance of Context,” (forthcoming
in Jesuit and Feminist Education: Intersections in Teaching and Learning for the
Twenty-First Century, Fordham University Press, 2011).
Secretary's Letter: September 2011
20 August 2011
Dear Members of the ACPA,
On behalf of the ACPA, I am pleased to invite all ACPA members to attend this year’s
Annual Conference, on “Science, Reason, and Religion,” to be held in St. Louis,
Missouri, from 27 to 30 October 2011. I would also like to invite all constituent
members to vote in this year’s election.
1. Annual Meeting on “Science, Reason, and Religion” to be held at the Chase Park
Plaza Hotel, St. Louis, 27 – 30 October 2011.
On behalf of the Association, I would like to thank St. Louis University for very
generously hosting the event. I would also like to thank all those who submitted
papers for the meeting, and especially the members of the Program Committee: Catherine
Deavel, Alex Eodice, and Glen Statile. The topic this year produced a very large
number of submissions with the result that our acceptance rate had to be very low.
The 2011 Conference will be held at the Chase Park Plaza Hotel, a beautiful old
hotel near St. Louis University (
http://www.chaseparkplaza.com/index.cfm).
The reduced rate for ACPA members is $120.00 per night for single or double occupancy,
plus applicable local taxes. In order to reserve your room, please phone the hotel
reservations desk directly (1-877-587-2427 or 1-314-633-3000); and be sure to identify
yourself as attending the ACPA Conference. In order to register for the conference,
please click on “
Register
for the Conference,” which takes you to our ACPA page on the Philosophy
Documentation Center Website. There you will be able to register for the Conference,
buy tickets to the Banquet and to the Women’s Luncheon, and pay your dues. Early
registration prices are good through 13 October 2011. These prices are as follows:
Conference Registration is $60.00, Student R egistration is $15.00, Banquet price
is $55.00 (which includes drinks and gratuity), and the Women’s Luncheon price is
$ 25.00. After 13 October, all prices increase by $ 5.00.
2. Program for the Annual Conference
The Program for the Annual Conference is posted here on the ACPA website. We will
also distribute the traditional paper Program at the Conference. At the Conference,
you will receive your Program at the Registration Table. And here let me thank Pam
Swope of the Philosophy Documentation Center, who does such a marvelous job in helping
to set up the Conference.
3. Election of ACPA Officers
Members whose dues are paid up will receive their election ballot by regular mail
in September.
4. Future ACPA Meetings
The 2012 meeting will be hosted by Loyola Marymount University of Los Angeles. The
topic will be “Philosophy in the Abrahamic Traditions” and our President will be
Prof. Richard Taylor, Marquette University. For submission guidelines and more details,
visit the ACPA’s web-site.
5. Reminder
If you have not done so, please be sure to pay your ACPA dues (dues notices were
emailed to all members in May of this year). The timely payment of your dues will
eliminate the need for reminder notices and thereby help to reduce the ACPA’s overall
costs. For more information, please go to the ACPA website or our page on the Philosophy
Documentation Center website.
6. Hosts for 2013 and 2014
We are looking for volunteers to host the 2013 and 2014 meetings. If you are interested,
please contact me at acpa@stthom.edu or houser@stthom.edu.
7. Necrology
If you know of a member who has died during these past two years, then please send
relevant details to me or to Pam Swope at the Philosophy Documentation Center.
Yours,
R. E. Houser
ACPA Secretary